The Role of Local Wisdom of the Community of the Gamaran Forest Area in the Development of Nyarai Salibutan Eco-Tourism as a Development of Ecosystem Services
Keywords:
ecotourism, local wisdom, ecosystem services, Nyarai
Abstract
An understanding of the services that ecosystems provide at the landscape level provides insight into the relationship between natural capital, ecosystem services, and human well-being. One of the available ecosystem services is ecotourism. Compared to conventional tourism, ecotourism has been reported as a sustainable measure to bridge conservation goals and the livelihoods of communities around protected areas. As a tourism industry, the role of environmental communication is very important for the development of ecotourism. This paper describes how local wisdom is implemented by the community in the development of the Nyarai Salibutan ecotourism object located in the Gamaran Forest area, Lubuk Alung, West Sumatra.
References
1. Tito, T. P. (2017). Valuasi Ekonomi Wisata Air Terjun Nyarai di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas).
2. Redford, KH; Adams, WM Conservation Biology; Blackwell Publishing Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 785–787.
3. MEA. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; ISBN 1-59726-040-1.
4. WTTC. The Economic Impact of Travel & Tourism: 2016 Annual Update; WTTC: London, UK, 2016.
5. Pueyo-Ros, J. (2018). The role of tourism in the ecosystem services framework. Land, 7(3), 111.
6. Urry, J. The Tourist Gaze; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2002; ISBN 0761973478.
7. Ghermandi, A.; Nunes, PALD A Global Map of Coastal Recreation Values: Results from a Spatially Explicit Based Meta-Analysis. Ekol. Ekonomi 2013, 86, 1–15.
8. Willson, GB Conceptualizing spiritual tourism: Cultural considerations and a comparison with religious tourism. Wisata. Kultus. komuni. 2016, 16.
9. Schaich, H.; Bieling, C.; Plieninger, T. Linking ecosystems services with cultural landscape research. Gaia 2010, 19, 269–277.
10. Milcu, AI; Hanspach, J.; Abson, D.; Fischer, J. Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Ekol. Soc. 2013, 18, 44.
11. Spradley, J.P. 1997. Metode Etnogra fi. Terjemahan oleh Misbah Yulfa Elisabeth.Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya.
12. Bungin, Burhan. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
13. Pengembangan Usaha Perhutanan Sosial Sumatera Barat Per Mei 2020
14. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
15. Faisal, Sanapiah. 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif (dasar-dasar dan aplikasi). Malang: Ya3 Malang.
16. Spradley.P. James. 1980. Participant Observation. Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
17. Stewart, C. J., & Cash, William B.. (2012). Interviu: prinsip dan praktik edisi 13. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.
18. Sutopo. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS.
19. Ngadisah. (2003). Konflik pembangunan dan gerakan sosial politik di Papua. Pustaka Raja
20. Erari, K. P. (2000). The crisis in Indonesia: new context for the mission and witness of the church. Reformed world, 50(4), 195-197.).
2. Redford, KH; Adams, WM Conservation Biology; Blackwell Publishing Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 785–787.
3. MEA. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; ISBN 1-59726-040-1.
4. WTTC. The Economic Impact of Travel & Tourism: 2016 Annual Update; WTTC: London, UK, 2016.
5. Pueyo-Ros, J. (2018). The role of tourism in the ecosystem services framework. Land, 7(3), 111.
6. Urry, J. The Tourist Gaze; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2002; ISBN 0761973478.
7. Ghermandi, A.; Nunes, PALD A Global Map of Coastal Recreation Values: Results from a Spatially Explicit Based Meta-Analysis. Ekol. Ekonomi 2013, 86, 1–15.
8. Willson, GB Conceptualizing spiritual tourism: Cultural considerations and a comparison with religious tourism. Wisata. Kultus. komuni. 2016, 16.
9. Schaich, H.; Bieling, C.; Plieninger, T. Linking ecosystems services with cultural landscape research. Gaia 2010, 19, 269–277.
10. Milcu, AI; Hanspach, J.; Abson, D.; Fischer, J. Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Ekol. Soc. 2013, 18, 44.
11. Spradley, J.P. 1997. Metode Etnogra fi. Terjemahan oleh Misbah Yulfa Elisabeth.Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya.
12. Bungin, Burhan. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
13. Pengembangan Usaha Perhutanan Sosial Sumatera Barat Per Mei 2020
14. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
15. Faisal, Sanapiah. 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif (dasar-dasar dan aplikasi). Malang: Ya3 Malang.
16. Spradley.P. James. 1980. Participant Observation. Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
17. Stewart, C. J., & Cash, William B.. (2012). Interviu: prinsip dan praktik edisi 13. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.
18. Sutopo. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS.
19. Ngadisah. (2003). Konflik pembangunan dan gerakan sosial politik di Papua. Pustaka Raja
20. Erari, K. P. (2000). The crisis in Indonesia: new context for the mission and witness of the church. Reformed world, 50(4), 195-197.).
Published
2021-07-07
How to Cite
Hasmira, M. H., Barlian, E., Fatimah, S., Heldi, & Umar, I. (2021). The Role of Local Wisdom of the Community of the Gamaran Forest Area in the Development of Nyarai Salibutan Eco-Tourism as a Development of Ecosystem Services. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 2(7), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v2i7.179
Section
Articles
