Typology of Plot and Images in Karakalpak and Kyrgyz Stories
Keywords:
story, writer, image, plot, typology
Abstract
The stories “Many Cranes Flew Away” by Karakalpak writer Shawdirbai Seitov and “The Early Cranes” by Kyrgyz writer Shingiz Aitmatov are analyzed in the article. Both works describe wartime village life and images of children. Moreover, the titles of the stories are very like. In studying this literary phenomenon in the literature of these two peoples, comparative typological and aesthetic analysis methods are used and their similarities and differences are defined.
References
1. Esenov J. Secrets of Mastership (The Problems of Artistic Psychologism in Modern Karakalpak Stories). – Nukus: “Karakalpakstan”, 1986;
2. Sultanov A. Sh. Aitmatov’s Poetic Traditions in Modern Karakalpak Prose. - Nukus: “Bilim”, 2007.
3. Maksetov K. About the stories of 1960s // Problems of Karakalpak Literature. - Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1975. Collection 1. – pp.177-202.; Bahadirova S. Poetry in the Language of Prose // newspaper Soviet Karakalpakstan. – Nukus, 1988. – No. 191. October 4. Narimbetov J. Towards the New Aesthetic Goals. – Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1985; Khudaibergenov K. Demands of the Times and the Creative Work of the Youth. – Problems of Karakalpak Literature. – Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1975. – p.146;
4. Veselovskiy A. N. Historical Poetry. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1989, p. 304.
5. Zhirmunskiy V.M. The Epic Art of the Slavic Peoples and the Problems of the Typological Study of the Epos. Moscow: The Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1958, pp.149, 435.
6. Durishin D. The Theory of Comparative Literary Study. Moscow: Progress, 1979. – p 317.
7. Kosimov A. Typological Similarities and Theoretical Problems of Mutual Influence (In the example of A de Saint-Exupery and A. Camus). Dissertation for the degree of Ph.D. Tashkent, 2007, p. 24
8. Seitov Sh. Talent and the Fate. // Amudarya, 1989, No.1, pp. 88-100.
9. Seitov Sh. Khashkhin. Stories. – Nukus: “Karakalpakstan”, 1969.
10. Aitmatov Sh. Early Cranes. – Nukus: “Karakalpakstan” 1978.
11. https://sputnik.kg/culture/20180421/1038789812/ehrte-kelgen-turnalar-povest/ 18.02.2022.
2. Sultanov A. Sh. Aitmatov’s Poetic Traditions in Modern Karakalpak Prose. - Nukus: “Bilim”, 2007.
3. Maksetov K. About the stories of 1960s // Problems of Karakalpak Literature. - Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1975. Collection 1. – pp.177-202.; Bahadirova S. Poetry in the Language of Prose // newspaper Soviet Karakalpakstan. – Nukus, 1988. – No. 191. October 4. Narimbetov J. Towards the New Aesthetic Goals. – Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1985; Khudaibergenov K. Demands of the Times and the Creative Work of the Youth. – Problems of Karakalpak Literature. – Nukus: Karakalpakstan, 1975. – p.146;
4. Veselovskiy A. N. Historical Poetry. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1989, p. 304.
5. Zhirmunskiy V.M. The Epic Art of the Slavic Peoples and the Problems of the Typological Study of the Epos. Moscow: The Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1958, pp.149, 435.
6. Durishin D. The Theory of Comparative Literary Study. Moscow: Progress, 1979. – p 317.
7. Kosimov A. Typological Similarities and Theoretical Problems of Mutual Influence (In the example of A de Saint-Exupery and A. Camus). Dissertation for the degree of Ph.D. Tashkent, 2007, p. 24
8. Seitov Sh. Talent and the Fate. // Amudarya, 1989, No.1, pp. 88-100.
9. Seitov Sh. Khashkhin. Stories. – Nukus: “Karakalpakstan”, 1969.
10. Aitmatov Sh. Early Cranes. – Nukus: “Karakalpakstan” 1978.
11. https://sputnik.kg/culture/20180421/1038789812/ehrte-kelgen-turnalar-povest/ 18.02.2022.
Published
2022-08-08
How to Cite
Orinbaevna, K. J. (2022). Typology of Plot and Images in Karakalpak and Kyrgyz Stories. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 3(8), 46-51. Retrieved from https://cajlpc.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJLPC/article/view/485
Section
Articles
