Khoja Ahrar Vali and the Philosophy of “Wahdat ul-Wujud”

Kholidakhon K. Rakhmatova

doi:10.17605/cajlpc.v5i2.1175

Kholidakhon K. Rakhmatova Department of Social Science, Bukhara State Pedagogical Institute, Bukhara, Uzbekistan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/cajlpc.v5i2.1175

Keywords: existence, ahad, unity, tawhid, wujud, vajib, wahdati wujud, kasrat, arif, deity

Abstract

This article delves into an in-depth exploration of mystical concepts within the spiritual legacy of Khoja Ahrar Vali, focusing particularly on his philosophical stance regarding "Wahdat Ul-Wujud," or the unity of existence. Through meticulous analysis, the researcher endeavors to elucidate Khoja Ahrar Vali's profound insights into the nature of humanity and existence, as informed by the principles of unity and interconnectedness. Central to the investigation is an examination of Khoja Ahrar Vali's perspectives on the intricate relationship between the individual self and the cosmic whole, emphasizing the ontological unity that underpins all existence. Drawing upon Khoja Ahrar Vali's spiritual teachings and philosophical reflections, the study aims to shed light on the profound wisdom embedded within his mystical worldview, offering valuable insights into the intricate fabric of human consciousness and the interconnectedness of all beings.

References

L. Matthews, W. Hertzog, T. Kyritsis, and R. Kerber, “Magic, religion, and science: secularization trends and continued coexistence,” J. Sci. Study Relig., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 5–27, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jssr.12813.
T. Hartson, “Converted structures: exploring material expressions of the sacred and secular,” Rev. Relig. Res., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 435–459, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13644-021-00447-0.
N. Huringiin, “Syed muhammad naquib al-attas’ critics toward secularism,” Akad. J. Pemikir. Islam, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 89, 2022, doi: 10.32332/akademika.v27i1.4801.
E. Puspitasari and A. Yuliana, “Syed muhammad naquib al-attas’ concept of islamizing science and its relevance to islamic education,” Al-Misbah J. Islam. Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 91–108, 2022, doi: 10.26555/almisbah.v10i2.6484.
T. Usmon, Tasavvuf tarixi. Istiqlol, 1999.
K. U. Ahror, Faqarotu-l-orifiyn (Ma’rifat ahli hayotidan lavhalar). 1999.
I. Hamdie, “Jejak-jejak pluralisme agama dalam sufisme,” Khazanah J. Studi Islam Dan Hum., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 263, 2019, doi: 10.18592/khazanah.v17i2.3207.
H. Bо̄lay, Turkiyada ruhparast va moddaparast qarashlar kurashi. Istanbul, 1967.
A. S. Jozjoniy, Naqshbandiya tariqati nazariyotchisi. Toshkent, 2004.
L. Chamankhah, “ḥall ul‐fuṣūṣ and its main tenets: a reading into mīr sayyid ʿalī hamadānī’s commentary on fuṣūṣ ul‐ḥikam,” Muslim World, 2024, doi: 10.1111/muwo.12477.
J. Xolmo’minov, “The philosophy of wahdat ul-wujud (the unity of being) and nakshbandism: transformation processes and specific features,” Comput. Linguist. Probl. Solut. Prospect, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 57–70, 2019, doi: 10.52773/tsuull.uzlc.2019.3/adpb2859.
A. Mukhammadkhojaev, Khodja Akhror (zhizn’ i uchenie). Kanibadam, 2000.
A. Choriev, Inson falsafasi. Toshkent, 2007.
A. S. Jozjoniy, Tasavvuf va inson. Toshkent, 2001.
J. Paul, Doctrine and organization: the Khwājagān/Naqshbandīya in the first generation after Bahā’uddīn. 1998. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204453781
K. U. Ahror, Faqarotu-l-orifiyn. Tabarruk risolalar. Adolat, 2004.