Algorithm of Word Order and Syntactic Analysis in Uzbek Language Sentences
Keywords:
Word order, parsing, treebank, Subordinate analysis, Cluster analysis, CFG, Noun phrase
Abstract
In this article, the word order and the place of sentence fragments in Uzbek language sentences, determining the correct order of sentences, the algorithm of syntactic analysis (parsing) of Uzbek language texts and the treebank structure are analyzed. Dependency parsing and Constituency parsing, which are syntactic analysis methods, are described. Simple sentence models, POS tagging, and part-of-speech tagging are shown. The Context-free grammar calculated by the syntactic parsing algorithm and graphs based on this grammar are given.
References
1. Altynbek Sharipbay, Assel Mukanova, Banu Yergesh, Bibigul Razakhova, Gaziza Yelibayeva. Syntax parsing model of Kazakh simple sentences, 2019.
2. Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures, – Mouton de Gruyter, 2002
3. Dönmez, ˙I., & Adalı, E. Türkçe Hal Ekleri ve Öbekleri Kapsayan Ba˘glamdan Ba˘gımsız Dil Temsili Kuralları. – Türkiye Bili¸sim Vakfı Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Mühendisli˘gi Dergisi, 2017. – 10(1), 33-40.
4. Ersin Ihsan Unkar (2007). PARSING TURKISH SENTENCES FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE WATERMARKING. – Bo´gazici University, 2007. – 154 b.
5. Gulsen Eryigit and Kemal Oflazer. Statistical dependency parsing of Turkish, 2006.
6. Jurafsky, Dan, Martin, James H. Speech and Language Processing An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. – New Jersey: PrenticeHall, 2000. – 927 b.
7. Gulshen Eryigit, Joakim Nivre, and Kemal Oflazer. Dependency parsing of turkish. Computational Linguistics, 2008. – P. 357 – 389.
8. Gulshen Eryigit. The impact of automatic morphological analysis & disambiguation on dependency parsing of Turkish, – Istanbul: European Language Resources Association, 2012. – P. – 1960–1965.
9. Kemal Oflazer. Turkish and its challenges for language processing. Lang. Resour. Eval., 48(4):639–653, 2014.
10. Salih Tunch. NEURAL DEPENDENCY PARSING FOR TURKISH, 2020. – P. 66
11. Sakai, Itiroo. Syntax in universal translation. – Teddington, England: International Conference on Machine Translation of Languages and Applied Language Analysis, 1961. – P. 593–608.
12. Sipser, Michael. Introduction to the Theory of Computation (1st ed.). – 1997. – p. 99.
13. Журинская М. А. Типологическая классификация языков // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Гл. ред. В. Н. Ярцева. Советская энциклопедия, 1990. – P. 511–512.
14. Abdurahmonov G‘.A., Shoabdurahmonov Sh.Sh., Hojiyev A.P. O‘zbek tili grammatikasi II T. Sintaksis. – Toshkent, 1976. – B. 181.
15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_parsing_(computational_linguistics)#CITEREFJurafskyMartin2021
16. https://www.baeldung.com/cs/constituency-vs-dependency-parsing
17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYK_algorithm#cite_note-1
18. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/constituency-parsing-and-dependency-parsing/
2. Chomsky, N. Syntactic Structures, – Mouton de Gruyter, 2002
3. Dönmez, ˙I., & Adalı, E. Türkçe Hal Ekleri ve Öbekleri Kapsayan Ba˘glamdan Ba˘gımsız Dil Temsili Kuralları. – Türkiye Bili¸sim Vakfı Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Mühendisli˘gi Dergisi, 2017. – 10(1), 33-40.
4. Ersin Ihsan Unkar (2007). PARSING TURKISH SENTENCES FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE WATERMARKING. – Bo´gazici University, 2007. – 154 b.
5. Gulsen Eryigit and Kemal Oflazer. Statistical dependency parsing of Turkish, 2006.
6. Jurafsky, Dan, Martin, James H. Speech and Language Processing An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. – New Jersey: PrenticeHall, 2000. – 927 b.
7. Gulshen Eryigit, Joakim Nivre, and Kemal Oflazer. Dependency parsing of turkish. Computational Linguistics, 2008. – P. 357 – 389.
8. Gulshen Eryigit. The impact of automatic morphological analysis & disambiguation on dependency parsing of Turkish, – Istanbul: European Language Resources Association, 2012. – P. – 1960–1965.
9. Kemal Oflazer. Turkish and its challenges for language processing. Lang. Resour. Eval., 48(4):639–653, 2014.
10. Salih Tunch. NEURAL DEPENDENCY PARSING FOR TURKISH, 2020. – P. 66
11. Sakai, Itiroo. Syntax in universal translation. – Teddington, England: International Conference on Machine Translation of Languages and Applied Language Analysis, 1961. – P. 593–608.
12. Sipser, Michael. Introduction to the Theory of Computation (1st ed.). – 1997. – p. 99.
13. Журинская М. А. Типологическая классификация языков // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Гл. ред. В. Н. Ярцева. Советская энциклопедия, 1990. – P. 511–512.
14. Abdurahmonov G‘.A., Shoabdurahmonov Sh.Sh., Hojiyev A.P. O‘zbek tili grammatikasi II T. Sintaksis. – Toshkent, 1976. – B. 181.
15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_parsing_(computational_linguistics)#CITEREFJurafskyMartin2021
16. https://www.baeldung.com/cs/constituency-vs-dependency-parsing
17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYK_algorithm#cite_note-1
18. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/constituency-parsing-and-dependency-parsing/
Published
2023-06-13
How to Cite
Mirdjanovna, H. S., Xolmo‘minovna, A. O., Abdusattor, R. M., & Bo’rikho’ja, N. F. (2023). Algorithm of Word Order and Syntactic Analysis in Uzbek Language Sentences. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 4(6), 79-90. Retrieved from https://cajlpc.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJLPC/article/view/900
Section
Articles
