Comparative Analysis Of Associative Fields In Uzbek And English Linguistic Cultures
Abstract
This study explores the integration of associative fields within Uzbek and English linguistic cultures, addressing a significant gap in cross-cultural linguistic research. While existing studies have primarily focused on individual languages, the comparative analysis of associative fields between different cultures remains underexplored. Utilizing a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative and quantitative analysis, we conducted associative experiments to examine the core components of everyday knowledge in both cultures. The findings reveal substantial differences in the cognitive mechanisms and strategies employed by Uzbek and English speakers, with Uzbeks demonstrating a preference for affective-evaluative approaches and English speakers favoring rational-analytical methods. These results underscore the importance of considering cultural context in linguistic research and have implications for enhancing intercultural communication and understanding.
References
N. Holikova, “The Concept of ‘Native Language’ in the Minds of Ukrainians,” Psycholinguistics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 106–127, 2022, doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2022-32-2-106-127.
E. S. Isajeva, “Associative field of the concept ‘fire’ in the linguistic consciousness of native Russian speakers at the background of the Latvian linguistic culture,” Russ. Lang. Stud., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2021, doi: 10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-3-241-252.
N. Dmitryuk, “Associative Dictionaries as an Ethnic Mental Phenomenon: Basic Values in the Core of Ethnic Group Language Consciousness,” Psycholinguistics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 59–84, 2021, doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2021-30-2-59-84.
M. S. Puig, “РОДИНА-PATRIA in Russian and Spanish verbal associative networks,” Rudn J. Lang. Stud. Semiot. Semant., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 302–315, 2021, doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-2-302-315.
N. Bhatti, “The main features of the lingvo-cultural type ‘teacher’ in the Russian and English lingvo-cultures,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 284, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202128408004.
I. Gordienko-Mytrofanova, “Investigating the concept of flirting as reflected in the Russian-speaking Ukrainians linguistic consciousness,” Psycholinguistics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 8–29, 2021, doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2021-29-1-8-29.
F. Sametova, “Representation of the concept of time in the linguistic consciousness,” Opcion, vol. 35, no. 88, pp. 27–52, 2019.
A. Zagidulina, “Associative fields of lexemes ‘Homeland’ and ‘Vatan’ in Russian and Tatar linguistic consciousness,” J. Lang. Lit., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 289–292, 2016, doi: 10.7813/jll.2016/7-2/55.
M. Shkuropatskaya, “National linguistic world image as a component of linguistic consciousness of a Russian and Mongolian language personality (a comparative aspect),” Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ. Filol., no. 1, pp. 80–95, 2016, doi: 10.17223/19986645/39/7.
D. Yakubova, “Concept of well-being in the Spanish and Russian languages,” Tonos Digit., no. 30, pp. 144–160, 2016.
Abdullaeva N. Vocabulary of English as a Foreign Language and its Teaching: a tutorial. - 3rd ed. - M-T.: Flint-Ilim Sazharasi, 2022.
Bubenova A. (2022). Associative field of the concepts of harm and utility in the consciousness of Native English Speakers. Philology and Culture, (3 (69)), 7-12.
Karimova N.K. (2023). A Study of the Ethnocultural Specificity of Everyday Knowledge through the Prism of Associative Fields. Bulletin of Science and Education. No. 5, 176-180.
Lutfullaeva D.E., Saparniyazova M. The problem of the associative approach to language at the present stage of Uzbek linguistics // Questions of cognitive linguistics. 2020. No. 2. P. 139-146.
Pankina M.F. Formation of semantic structures in the lexical system of language (based on the Russian and English lexical-semantic fields "kinetic state of the agent"): Diss. ... Doctor of Philological Sciences: 10.02.19 / M.F. Pankina. - Voronezh, 2022.