Sociopragmatic Characteristics of Works Taken Separately in the Dramas of Sharof Boshbekov
Keywords:
Expression, Linguistics, Method, Task, Logic, Grammar, Rhetoric, Speaker, Listener, Vocabulary
Abstract
This article investigates the sociopragmatic characteristics of verbal and non-verbal communication in Sharof Boshbekov’s dramas. A gap in existing literature is identified, highlighting the limited research on sociopragmatic analysis of short stories in the Uzbek language. The study employs qualitative analysis, focusing on auxiliary words, modal expressions, and exclamations that convey internal attitudes in dialogues. The findings demonstrate how these linguistic elements enhance communication between characters, revealing deeper socio-cultural contexts. The results suggest that such expressions play a critical role in enriching the pragmatic and emotional content of dialogues, with implications for further research in Uzbek linguistics and semiotics.
References
[1] Arnold I. V. implication kak priem postroenie teksta i predmet filologicheskie izucheniy //VYa. – M. 1982.
[2] Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
[3] Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Dolinin K. A. Implitsitnoe soderjanie vyskazyvaniya// VYa. – M. 1983. No. 6.
[5] Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
[6] Ghulamov A. Askarova M. Current Uzbek literary language . -Tashkent , 1987. – p. 37.
[7] Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.
[8] Greimas A. J. Kurt J. Semiotics . Explanatory dictionary theory of language// Semiotics. - M.; Raduga , 1983 . – p. 488-493 .
[9] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
[10] Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
[11] Hoang Fe. Semantika vyskazyvaniya//Novoe vzarubezhnoy lingvistike Vyp. X VI. – M. 1985. – pp. 399-405.
[12] Huang F. Semantika vyslazyvaniya//Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. X VI. - M., 1985 . - pp. 399-400.
[13] Khalizev V. K. Subtext// Kratkaya literaturnaya ensklopedia T. 5. - M. 1968.
[14] Khursnaov N.I. Discourse Studies in Anthropocentric Linguistics // Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Uzbekistan. Vol 7. Issue 1. - pp. 362-364.
[15] Kuronov D. Reading and comprehension exercises . - Tashkent Academy 2013.
[16] Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[17] Luharenko V. A. Typy i sredstva – vyrajeniya imlikatsii v angliyskoi khudojestvennoy prose// FN. 1974.
[18] Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
[19] Myrkin V Ya Text podtekst i context // VYa. - M. 1976.
[20] Myrkin V. Text subtext and context//VYa. - M., 1976. – p. 91.
[21] Safarov Sh. Cognitive linguistics. - Jizzakh: Sangzor, 2006.-B.96.
[22] Salmina L. M. Kostycheva L. M. Semantic structure of godly text and translation. //Expressivnost teksta iperevod . - Kazan. 1991. -S. 107.
[23] Silman T. I. Podekst -eto glubina texta//Voprosy literatury 1969.
[24] Silman T. I. Podekst kak lingvisticheskoe yavleniya // FN. 1969.
[25] Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.
[26] Stepanov Yu. S. V mire semiotiki// Sumiotics . - M.: Raduga, 1983 . - p. 8.
[27] Torsueva I.G. Teoriya vyslazyvaniya i intonatsii//Voprosy yazykoznaniya . - M. , 1976 . #2. – pp. 53-54.
[28] Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
[2] Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
[3] Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Dolinin K. A. Implitsitnoe soderjanie vyskazyvaniya// VYa. – M. 1983. No. 6.
[5] Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
[6] Ghulamov A. Askarova M. Current Uzbek literary language . -Tashkent , 1987. – p. 37.
[7] Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books.
[8] Greimas A. J. Kurt J. Semiotics . Explanatory dictionary theory of language// Semiotics. - M.; Raduga , 1983 . – p. 488-493 .
[9] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
[10] Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
[11] Hoang Fe. Semantika vyskazyvaniya//Novoe vzarubezhnoy lingvistike Vyp. X VI. – M. 1985. – pp. 399-405.
[12] Huang F. Semantika vyslazyvaniya//Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. X VI. - M., 1985 . - pp. 399-400.
[13] Khalizev V. K. Subtext// Kratkaya literaturnaya ensklopedia T. 5. - M. 1968.
[14] Khursnaov N.I. Discourse Studies in Anthropocentric Linguistics // Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Uzbekistan. Vol 7. Issue 1. - pp. 362-364.
[15] Kuronov D. Reading and comprehension exercises . - Tashkent Academy 2013.
[16] Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[17] Luharenko V. A. Typy i sredstva – vyrajeniya imlikatsii v angliyskoi khudojestvennoy prose// FN. 1974.
[18] Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
[19] Myrkin V Ya Text podtekst i context // VYa. - M. 1976.
[20] Myrkin V. Text subtext and context//VYa. - M., 1976. – p. 91.
[21] Safarov Sh. Cognitive linguistics. - Jizzakh: Sangzor, 2006.-B.96.
[22] Salmina L. M. Kostycheva L. M. Semantic structure of godly text and translation. //Expressivnost teksta iperevod . - Kazan. 1991. -S. 107.
[23] Silman T. I. Podekst -eto glubina texta//Voprosy literatury 1969.
[24] Silman T. I. Podekst kak lingvisticheskoe yavleniya // FN. 1969.
[25] Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.
[26] Stepanov Yu. S. V mire semiotiki// Sumiotics . - M.: Raduga, 1983 . - p. 8.
[27] Torsueva I.G. Teoriya vyslazyvaniya i intonatsii//Voprosy yazykoznaniya . - M. , 1976 . #2. – pp. 53-54.
[28] Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Published
2024-10-04
How to Cite
Abdujalilovna, M. N. (2024). Sociopragmatic Characteristics of Works Taken Separately in the Dramas of Sharof Boshbekov. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 5(5), 172-183. Retrieved from https://cajlpc.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJLPC/article/view/1197
Section
Articles
