The Role of Somatic Phraseology in the Development of the Field of Lexicology
Abstract
Somatic phraseology contributes to the formations of the field of lexicology by giving way to the study of the relationship of language to the human body. By examining the somatic phrases and expressions, lexicologists can learn more about bodies: how they are understood, how they are represented. But this expands our understanding of what cultural and social attitudes toward the body; at the same time, it unearths those cognitive processes that come to bear on both language production and comprehension. In this paper, we attempt to examine how somatic phraseology impacts lexicology and it’s implications on the way we look at human cognition and communication.
References
Paquot, M. (2015, January 1). Lexicography and phraseology
Odegova, O V., & Zabulionite, K. (2014, October 1). Linguacultural Globalization: Objective Tendencies and the Perspective Issue. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.196
Antrushina G.B. and others. English Lexicology. M., 1985.
Amosova N.N. Fundamentals of English phraseology. H., 1963.
Arbekova T.I. Lexicology of English. M., 1977.
Arnold I.V. Lexicology of modern English. M., 1973.
KuninA.V. English phraseology. M., 1970.
Logan P. Smith. The Phraseology of the English Language. Trans.by A. Ignatyev, M., 1959.
S. M. Akpaca, “Transferring meaning in a context of multilingual lexicology and terminology,” Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1901–1911, 2024, doi: 10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1563.
S. von der Fecht-Fernández, “The Role of Richard Hakluyt’s The Principall Nauigations (1589) in the Introduction and Dissemination of Spanish Loanwords in the English Language,” Neophilologus, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 123–146, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11061-023-09791-8.
C. Cabrillana, “Recent trends and findings in Latin Linguistics,” Recent Trends and Findings in Latin Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 1–708, 2024, doi: 10.1515/9783110722116.
F. R. González, “New perspectives on languages in contact,” New Perspectives on Languages in Contact, pp. 1–407, 2024, doi: 10.3726/b21525.
E. Kotorova, “Lexical field theory: Key concepts and contemporary approaches,” Stud Neophilol, 2024, doi: 10.1080/00393274.2024.2398417.
E. Taseva, “Metaphorical concepts of somatic expressions in German and macedonian phraseology,” Palimpsest, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 73–84, 2021, doi: 10.46763/PALIM21116073t.
N. V Karpinskay, “Characteristics of Somatic Phraseology in E. Vodolazkin’s Novel ‘Lavr’: Semantics, Functional Potential, Frequency of Use,” RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1253–1270, 2023, doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-4-1253-1270.
T. Bastardín, “A Contribution to the Study of the 18th Textile Lexicon in the Inventories of Goods from Cádiz,” RILCE. Revista de Filologia Hispanica, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 697–721, 2024, doi: 10.15581/008.40.2.697-721.
I. E. Özdoğan, “The Position of al-Taqfiya in the Rhyme School of Arabic Dictionary Writing History,” Ankara Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 317–339, 2024, doi: 10.33227/auifd.1355400.
W. Schweickard, “The word history of French banqueroute, German Bankrott and Italian bancarotta,” Z Rom Philol, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 587–597, 2024, doi: 10.1515/zrp-2024-0027.
E. A. Tsypanov, “Non-equivalent vocabulary of the Komi language: jidzh, repas,” Bulletin of Ugric Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 317–324, 2024, doi: 10.30624/2220-4156-2024-14-2-317-324.