Issues of Transforming Enlightenment Into a High Moral Value in Society
Abstract
Several scholars today accept a strong connection between education and national progress. Under New Uzbekistan’s reform agenda the government is focused on building an enlightened society because education serves as both a social service and a transformative instrument for advancing intellectual and moral development. Research on education in development normally exists yet focuses primarily on separate approaches instead of exploring synergistic methods to boost enlightenment as a top moral priority in post-Soviet transformation settings. This article examines theoretical and methodological frameworks to develop an enlightened society of Uzbekistan while studying the social-philosophical pathways that guide enlightenment as a moral value in policy creation and social reforms. The study reveals education acts as a key factor to decrease social disparities while strengthening public health care systems and improving democratic systems. The research examination deplores international education standards for their inability to meet local developmental requirements. The research combines social and philosophical methods to explain enlightenment as a moral concept which connects education to economic results and social achievements while safeguarding cultural integrity in modern globalization. These findings carry important implications for educational policies because enlightenment education works as a sustainable method to fight social inequality while solving unemployment and civic disengagement problems as it prepares a society that is intellectually strong and morally grounded.
References
Foreign Education: Development Issues. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2016.
G. Saidova and others, Education in Uzbekistan: the balance of supply and demand. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2008.
D. N. Rakhmatov, “The classification and impact of capacity in identifying development strategies,” Educ. Sci. Innov., no. 2, p. 22, 2016.
K. Porayska-Pomsta, W. Holmes, and S. Nemorin, “The Ethics of AI in Education,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv240611842, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.11842.
S. Otamuratov, Globalization: the responsibility to preserve national identity. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2018.
A. B. Nevelov, “The individual: forming a spiritual identity (philosophical foundations of educational activity),” Bull. MNOO Lab., no. 2, p. 163, 1995.
A. Nazarov, “Uzbekistan’s role in global development processes,” Democr. Hum. Rights, no. 1–2, p. 17, 2002.
D. Narvaez, “Moral Neuroeducation from Early Life Through the Lifespan,” Neuroethics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 173–187, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9110-8.
P. Lutfullaev, “Features of the internationalization of higher education: international experience,” in Prospects for the development of higher education, M. A. Rakhmatullaev, Ed., Tashkent: Vita Color, 2014, p. 75.
M. Kopec and others, “The Effectiveness of Embedded Values Analysis Modules in Computer Science Education: An Empirical Study,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv220805453, 2022, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.05453.
H. Han, “Potential Benefits of Employing Large Language Models in Research in Moral Education and Development,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv230613805, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.13805.
M. Emmanuel, Revolution. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 2019.
V. Domrachev, “Distance learning: opportunities and perspectives,” High. Educ. Russ., no. 3, pp. 10–12, 1994.
J. Dela Cruz, K. D. Abre, and L. J. Caloc, “Navigating the Moral Values of Senior High School Students,” Psychol. Educ. Multidiscip. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13890534.
J. Decety and J. M. Cowell, “The Complex Relation Between Morality and Empathy,” Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 337–339, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008.
T. Asif and others, “Moral Education for Sustainable Development: Comparison of University Teachers’ Perceptions in China and Pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 3014, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12073014.
