The Metadiscoursal Functions of Metaphor in Linguistic Discourse

Abbas Talib Alfelugi; Ali  Smesim

doi:10.51699/cajlpc.v6i4.1305

Abbas Talib Alfelugi Department of English Language, College of Education, University of Kufa
Ali Smesim Department of English Language, College of Education, University of Kufa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v6i4.1305

Keywords: Metaphor, Implicit Metadiscourse, Linguistic Discourse

Abstract

This study offers a comparative analysis of how metaphor is deployed by leading linguists and explores the metadiscoursal functions of metaphor in linguistic discourse, focusing particularly on its use as a multifunctional and implicit metadiscoursal category. It compares the functions of the metaphorical use of examples and analogies employed in linguistic discourse. Drawing on Hyland (2005) framework of the functions of metadiscourse, the study examines how these theorists utilize metaphors such as language as a mirror, computation, blueprint, and instinct to guide interpretation, facilitate abstraction, and frame linguistic and cognitive phenomena. Metaphor is analyzed not as a literary concept but as a metadiscoursal strategy used systematically in linguistic theorizing. The paper clarifies the source-to-target domain mappings of these metaphors and suggests that metaphor performs functions like framing, explaining and clarifying, asserting claims, and engaging the reader. The study argues that metaphor is a conceptual and rhetorical tool that frames assumptions, guides the reader to the desired interpretation, reinforces theoretical identity and deflects counterargument.

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215

Beaugrande, R. de. (1991). Language and the Facilitation of Authority: The Discourse of Noam Chomsky (Reader Response). The Journal of Advanced Composition, 11(2).

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse. Studies in Academic Discourse.

CRISMORE, A., MARKKANEN, R., & STEFFENSEN, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002

Feng, Z. (2022). The interaction and rhetorical conflict between systemic linguistics and generative linguistics. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0032

Harris, R. A. (1989). Argumentation in Chomsky’ssyntactic structuresan exercise in rhetoric of science. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 19(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773948909390840

HYLAND, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007

Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse : exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury. (Original work published 2005)

Kopple, W. J. V. (1985). Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609

Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric.: A Textlinguistic Study. In Peter Lang eBooks. Peter Lang.

Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.

Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). On Nature and Language, and: The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology, and: Language in a Darwinian Perspective (review). Language, 79(3), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0180

Noam Chomsky. (2002). On nature and language. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought : language as a window into human nature. Viking.

Sinclair, J. (2004). Planes of Discourse. In J. Sinclair & R. Carter (Eds.), Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (pp. 51–66). Routledge.

Werry, C. (2007). Reflections on language: Chomsky, linguistic discourse and the value of rhetorical self-consciousness. Language Sciences, 29(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2006.01.0